• Home   /  
  • Archive by category "1"

Structuralism Vs Functionalism Essays

Structuralism And Functionalism Essay

One could say that Titchener is seen as the father of structuralism. Thought he gives great credit to Wundt, he altered Wundts theory extensively resulting in a new theory. Structuralism, in short, is the "system of psychology, which dealt with conscious experience as a dependant on experiencing persons" (Schultz, 2004, p509). This varies greatly from the functionalism approach that's focus is on the mind and how it adapts with its environment.

Structuralism brought forth the focusing on mental attributes and linking them through the process of association. Titchener believed that psychology's goal was to "discover the nature of the elementary conscious experiences--to analyze consciousness into its component parts and thus determine its structure." (Schultz, 2004, p117). Much of this was done thought introspection.

Functionalism, on the other hand, began as a result of Titchener's Structural theory and greatly influenced American education. It incorporated basic ideology from William James and Charles Darwin. It's an eclectic viewpoint that focuses on function rather than the structure of the mental process. Harvey A. Car defined psychology as having two major components. He defined "the subject matter of psychology as mental activity--those processes such as memory, perception, feeling, imagination, judgment, and will." (Schultz, 2004, p199) He also stated that the "function of mental activity is to acquire, fixate, retain, organize, and evaluate experiences and to use these experiences to determine one's actions." (Schultz, 2004, p199) He labeled these as adaptive or adjustive behaviors.

Though the two theories are on different ends of the spectrum, they both...

Loading: Checking Spelling

0%

Read more

psychology Essay

803 words - 3 pages Running head: FOUNDATION OF PSYCHOLOGY PAGE \* MERGEFORMAT 1 Foundation of Psychology"Psychology is a science of behavior and mental performing that uses the quantitative and qualitative research studies to promote and test hypothesis and put forward theories and models that explain human behavior.( http://www.helium.com/item/-history of psychology)Identify the major schools of thought in psychology and...

Foundations of Psychology Essay

753 words - 3 pages Foundations of PsychologyFoundations of PsychologyPsychology is an academic and applied discipline involving the scientific study of mental processes and behavior. There is some tension between scientific psychology (with its program of empirical research) and applied psychology (dealing with a number of areas). Psychologists attempt to explain the mind and brain in the context of real life. In contrast neurologists utilize a physiological...

The History of Psychology

1970 words - 8 pages The History of Psychology In order to discuss Psychology's history, it is important to understand that psychology still does not have one unifying approach unlike the natural sciences; even the definition of Psychology and what it truly means is still undecided. However I shall attempt to review chronologically its philosophical origins, include...

Psychology: Its origins from the 19th century to the present. (Talks about the schools of Psychology)

1661 words - 7 pages IntroductionBefore we can begin, we must first answer the question, 'What is Psychology?' and also describe the subject. Psychology is the scientific study of behavior and mental processes. Most of the experts have agreed that it was Aristotle who was a great contributor to this divine subject because he "touched" on almost all aspects of psychology.While another man,

Foundations of Psychology

1061 words - 4 pages Psychology is a science of behavior and mental processes. From the beginning, Aristotle has touched on every aspect of psychology but it was William Wundt who was known as the father of psychology. He established psychology as a field of scientific studies dependent from philosophy. When psychology was first founded, there were only a few foundations of psychology,...

Functionalism Theory of Education

1389 words - 6 pages There are three main theoretical perspectives (or theories) that represent the views of sociologist and educators, these views are the conflict perspective, symbolic interactions, and functionalism. Although all of these theories are important to education and society, I have chosen to focus my research or theoretical perspective on functionalism also including the effects functionalism and education. The Functionalist perspective is one of the...

Foundations of Psychology

1147 words - 5 pages Foundations of PsychologyWhen thinking about the major schools of thought in psychology, you think first about psychology as a whole which is a study of the mind and human behavior, the different schools of thought are the main concepts studied through psychology. The schools of thought are biopsychology, cross-cultural psychology, structuralism and functionalism. Then you view the perspectives in psychology, these perspectives are...

The following is my summary of the ten early perspectives of psychology.

1130 words - 5 pages In psychology there are ten early perspectives. These perspectives are structuralism, functionalism, Gestalt psychology, behaviorism, psychodynamic, humanistic, physiological, evolutionary, cognitive, and cultural and diversity. The different perspectives in early psychology have had a tremendous influence on modern psychology, and the way it has...

The Importance of Human Evolution

2401 words - 10 pages Introduction The main purpose of this essay is to critically discuss the importance of an understanding of human evolution and the history of psychology for the modern psychologist. The essay aims to critically discuss the study of human evolution which includes some of the species that evolved over the years before we now have our species, the history of psychology and the different prominent figures that are responsible for psychology being the...

10 Perspectives of Early Psychology

850 words - 3 pages As described, there are 10 different perspectives of early psychology. These perspectives are: Structuralism, functionalism, Gestalt psychology, Behavioral, psychodynamic, humanistic, physiological, evolutionary, cognitive, and cultural and diversity. Here is a summary of each.Structuralism is "the earliest approach in modern psychology, founded by...

Foundations of Psychology - 714 words

714 words - 3 pages Foundations of PsychologyPsychology encircles a very large amount of different theories, thoughts, and also biological foundations of behavior. To tell why people act the way they do. Psychology was once a part of philosophy and has developed itself into several schools of thought....

Contents

1. An Overview of Three Linguistic Theories and Their Progress

2. Comparison between structuralism, formalism and functionalism

3. References

1. An Overview of Three Linguistic Theories and Their Progress

The linguistic schools structuralism, formalism and functionalism are not as homogenous as they are presented in the following text. Many philosophies, grammars or seminars of linguists are put together as a mainstream in linguistics because of their similarities. As a consequence of their diversity and complexity, neither functionalism nor generative linguistics can be explained in detail: This essay wants to give a very small outline on philological schools and attempts to express their differences and their development.

The most influential school in linguistics of the twentieth century is of course structuralism. This theory, founded by Ferdinand de Saussure, has been posthumously published in Cours de linguistique generale (1916). In this essay, only the conclusions which are considered as Saussurean structuralism are described whereas other approaches like Prague school or American structuralism are left out. It is important to note that both functionalism and formalism developed from the basis of this linguistic school.
A hallmark of structuralism is that linguistic phenomena are regarded “as systems or the product of systems” and not as “collections of isolated items or in terms of their history”[1]. Within the system of language, the value (valeur) of each sign is determined by its place in this scheme. Consequently, linguistic signs have no existence out of this structure and “every language system needs to be considered by itself”[2].The way of studying a language system is synchronic (contemplation of language at one specific point in time) and not diachronic (contemplation of linguistic change through time), to make sure that just one scheme of language is analyzed. Another primacy in structuralism is langue, the set of rules of a language, in contrast to parole, the usage of a language by an individual speaker. Due to this, it is possible for structuralists to describe the regularities of a language.

Equally important is the model of the linguistic sign. According to Saussure, each sign has two sides which cannot be separated: The signifier is the sound image of a sign, whereas the signified is the concept of a sign. Both of them are connected by a reciprocal relationship, which means that the sound image of a sign evokes its concept and the other way around. Further, there is no motivated bond between signifier and signified. In fact, the link between the two sides of a sign is “based on an agreement, a kind of contract, as it were, between the members of a speech community”[3]. This kind of liaison is called relationship of arbitrariness and conventionality.

While structural linguistics rather deals with langue, functionalism wants to explain how the concrete usage of a language in a given context shapes its structure, and tries to describe the communicative aspects of a language[4]. Therefore, language is considered to be a “tool”[5] with external functions (usage in communication) and internal functions (various set of communicative functions).

A phenomenon of internal functions is organic embedding. In accordance to Butler, it means that “morphosyntax of a language is motivated by the meanings that it conveys”[6]. In other words, a speaker of a given language has to make a choice between structural options, which is determined by information he has given before or which he might gives later within a conversation or a text. This leads to the assumption that syntax is not considered as an autonomous branch of linguistics, but as influenced by semantics and pragmatics[7].

Another important feature of functional linguistics is the idea of a motivated relationship between the concept and the sound image of a sign, and that external functions shape the grammar of a language. As an illustration, the concept of iconicity describes a motivated link or a similarity, which can be found among the two sides of an onomatopoetic sign or cognitive and structural difficulties[8].

[...]



[1] Clark 2006: p.165

[2] Kortmann p.14

[3] Kortmann p.16

[4] Smirnova 2010: 13

[5] Smirnova 2010: 13

[6] Butler 2006: 698

[7] Butler 2006: 698

[8] Kortmann2005: 26

One thought on “Structuralism Vs Functionalism Essays

Leave a comment

L'indirizzo email non verrà pubblicato. I campi obbligatori sono contrassegnati *